DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
Limitations and consider your apol ne oe:
three-member panel of the Board for Nav Re
Sitting in On, Cconss tio
cr
25 March 2015. The names and votes o:? members of the
‘gations of error
ch administ 11
the proce - ‘
vy th oy
subtr r €
ial subm: Gd i
nao we -pe ° ~ "
mae =
- bbc i = " oa
You enlists
duty on th
months
21 January
punishment
court-martial
government vor
= - F477
wrongft
@rug abuse. The discharge authority approved this recommendation
and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by
reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion of suffering
with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) which existed prior to
service. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given the seriousness of your misconduct. Further you were given
an opportunity to defend your actions, but waived your procedural
rights. Regarding your assertion of suffering from TBI, there is
no evidence in the record and you provided none to support your
assertion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
eI gs
Sone FET Tr
haa
SOTTO
ee ea ae
Pa
ey
PRN OEY SSE NTE
SRST ee
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3452 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3458 14_Redacted
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. Documentary materia considered by the Board ¢ your application, together with all material submitted in support a : = thereof, your naval Tecora, anda applicable statutes, regulations, and policies After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10805 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2657 14
A ‘three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of - your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. — Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3010 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consi your application, together with all material submitted in thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulati and policies After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence sul tted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable erial error or Ln uselce l You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active duty on 28 June 1968. New evidence is evidence not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR849 14
In April 2010, after waiving your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and present your case to an administrative discharge board, your commanding officer recommended separation under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Finally, the Board concluded that your assertion of being set up to fail at standing watch is without merit sinre there is no evidence in the record, and you provided no such evidence to support this assertion. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR660 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nonetheless, your request was denied and the BCD was subsequently approved at all levels of review, and on 30 January 1976, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1805 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all — material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. as a result of the foregoing period of UA totalling 203.days, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2593 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by O ed of your application, together with all mater: pport ther naval record, and applicable ions, After and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice You enlisted in the Navy and began...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5458 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 27 July 1987, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct.